whitelawful, thanks for stopping by the blog. I don’t think it was intended to be blasphemy. It may be unethical as graffiti generally tends to be illegal, but the city of St. Louis seems to have ceded this flood wall to such graffiti as it goes on for nearly a mile solid. Some of it is really quite good, visually speaking and some have some interesting, thought provoking messages.
It looks like blasphemy.
whitelawful, thanks for stopping by the blog. I don’t think it was intended to be blasphemy. It may be unethical as graffiti generally tends to be illegal, but the city of St. Louis seems to have ceded this flood wall to such graffiti as it goes on for nearly a mile solid. Some of it is really quite good, visually speaking and some have some interesting, thought provoking messages.
Sorry, I meant to address you as whiteylawful and am sorry for the typo.